The AI Regulation Frontier

Be sure to check out Keypoint Intelligence’s Artificial Intelligence Advisory Service!

As artificial intelligence (AI) revolutionizes industries and reshapes our daily lives, the need for thoughtful regulation becomes increasingly apparent. Following Keypoint Intelligence’s recent webinar AI Revolution in Print and Document Solutions: Navigating Trends, Regulations, and Opportunities, which addressed regulation as one of the many anticipated AI trends reshaping workflow efficiency and document security, we recognize that the reasons for regulating AI are as diverse as they are crucial.

Our recent 2024 AI Readiness and Benchmarking Survey also underscores AI’s growing importance in business. We gathered insights from 454 US-based company leaders involved in AI tech decisions across industries and organizational sizes. A staggering 81% of respondents rated AI’s importance to their organization’s future success as either a 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale (with 5 being the highest), which makes the question of regulation more pressing.

A World of Contrasts

The global patchwork of approaches to AI governance remains strikingly uneven. Some regions are taking bold steps, while others seem content to watch from the sidelines. Leading the charge is the European Union with its comprehensive AI Act, set to become the world's first broad legal framework for AI. It categorizes AI systems based on risk levels and imposes strict requirements for high-risk applications. Much like the GDPR did for data protection, the EU’s approach is setting a global benchmark for AI governance.

Other countries are also making progress with their own regulations:

• The United States, while lacking a unified federal approach, is making strides with initiatives like NIST's AI Risk Management Framework and the White House’s AI Bill of Rights.
  • Meanwhile, California is pushing ahead with its own AI safety regulations, despite pushback from tech firms, highlighting the palpable tension between rapid development and the need for oversight.
• China is taking a more targeted approach, focusing on specific applications like algorithmic recommendations and deepfakes.
• The UK favors innovation-friendly guidelines over strict regulations.
• Canada is pushing forward with its Artificial Intelligence and Data Act, zeroing in on high-impact AI systems.
• Lastly, Japan and Singapore are emphasizing softer ethical guidelines and sector-specific regulations as part of their AI governance framework.

It comes as no surprise, then, that 65% of our surveyed organizations already have an AI use policy in place, with another 28% developing one. Companies are recognizing the need to self-regulate in the absence of consistent global standards.

Cross-Industry Impact

It’s not just governments taking action. The OASIS global standards body has launched the Coalition for Secure AI (CoSAI)—a collaboration bringing together tech giants like Google, IBM, and Microsoft. Their goal is to develop standardized frameworks for secure-by-design AI systems, tackling issues like model theft, data poisoning, and inference attacks. This industry-led initiative signals a proactive approach to AI security and standards.

In healthcare, AI regulation could influence everything from medical diagnostics to drug discovery. The financial sector will need to ensure AI-driven algorithms for trading and credit scoring comply with new requirements. The automotive industry will grapple with regulations around autonomous vehicles, while education tech companies will need to address data protection and fairness in AI-powered learning systems.

Media and publishing giants are also in the crosshairs. Condé Nast and Forbes have recently taken legal action against Perplexity AI, alleging copyright infringement and demanding content removal. This dispute exemplifies the growing tension between traditional media and AI companies over fair use and content ethics. Calls for congressional intervention and licensing agreements highlight the urgent need for clear guidelines in this space.

Clearly, as companies implement AI, they’re acutely aware of the need to secure these systems. Interestingly, our survey reveals that while 32% of tech industry leaders cite cybersecurity as a key driver for AI adoption, only 13% mention regulatory requirements. This gap suggests many organizations may be underestimating the impact of legal battles in AI development. As high-profile cases like those in the media sector unfold, regulatory concerns are likely to become a higher priority for AI adopters.

Looking Ahead

While regulation aims to ensure responsible AI development, it's not without challenges. There are concerns that overly restrictive rules could impede innovation or create compliance nightmares for companies operating across multiple jurisdictions. Our survey identified the lack of skilled personnel (35%), concerns about job losses (36%), and data infrastructure limitations (32%) as the top barriers to AI adoption.

However, regulation can also promote more transparent, fair, and ethical AI systems. Clear regulations and oversight mechanisms can help build public trust in AI technologies—potentially accelerating their adoption. In fact, 46% of survey respondents noted that AI has already “significantly” or “moderately improved” cross-departmental knowledge sharing in their organizations.

Based on these findings, we can expect several key developments in AI regulation:

• Efforts like the EU’s AI Act may emerge in other regions, potentially leading to a GDPR-like global standard for AI.
  • Countries and regions with more flexible AI regulations might gain a competitive edge in AI development. However, those with stricter regulations could become leaders in developing trustworthy, ethical AI systems—potentially setting global standards.
• Companies will likely face requirements to conduct regular audits of their AI systems, particularly for high-risk applications.
• Large tech companies may be mandated to establish independent ethics boards to oversee AI development and deployment.
• Governments may invest in public education initiatives to improve AI literacy for more informed societal discussions on AI regulation.
• New legal frameworks will address liability issues in AI-related incidents, particularly in areas like autonomous vehicles.
• The transnational nature of AI might necessitate global cooperation on tech regulation, and we could see the emergence of international AI governance bodies like those in climate change or nuclear non-proliferation.

The conversation around AI regulation is just beginning. Companies that can adapt quickly to new regulations while pushing the boundaries of AI technology will be best positioned for success. Getting regulation right will require an ongoing dialog between policymakers, industry leaders, and the public—creating a future where technology enhances rather than diminishes our humanity.

Browse through our Industry Reports page (latest reports only). Log in to the InfoCenter to view research on AI, regulation, and plenty more through our Artificial Intelligence and Workplace CompleteView Advisory Services. If you’re not a subscriber, contact us for more info by clicking here.